viberank
Model economics

Observed spend

claude-fable-5

What developers actually spend on claude-fable-5 — measured from real sessions, not list prices. For specs and pricing tables, look elsewhere; this page only answers what the model costs the people using it.

Per developer
$5,533
across their tracked usage
Developers
350
observed using it
Share of spend
16%
#3 of all models tracked

Frontier workload

High spend concentrated in relatively few developers — the pattern of a model reserved for long agentic runs rather than everyday edits.

For scale, spend per developer across tracked models runs from claude-haiku-4-5 at $54 to gpt-5.6-sol at $12,637 — a spread list pricing alone never reveals, because it depends entirely on what people reach for the model to do.

Against other models

ModelPer developerShare
claude-fable-5$5,53316%
gpt-5.6-sol$12,63722%
claude-opus-4-8$5,30316%
claude-opus-5$8,62615%
gpt-5.5$5,30813%
claude-opus-4-6$1,7815%
claude-opus-4-7$1,8644%
claude-sonnet-5$7542%
gpt-5.4$8121%

How this is measured

Developers run npx viberank-cli, which reads token counts and API-equivalent costs that ccusage computes from their own local session logs. Spend here is what the usage would cost at model list prices — most people on the board pay a flat subscription instead, so this measures consumption rather than a bill.

Full methodology, caveats and a free JSON endpoint are on the data page. For the distribution across developers rather than models, see what Claude Code actually costs.