viberank
Model economics

Observed spend

claude-fable-5

What developers actually spend on claude-fable-5 — measured from real sessions, not list prices. For specs and pricing tables, look elsewhere; this page only answers what the model costs the people using it.

Per developer
$5,105
across their tracked usage
Developers
397
observed using it
Share of spend
14%
#4 of all models tracked

Frontier workload

High spend concentrated in relatively few developers — the pattern of a model reserved for long agentic runs rather than everyday edits.

For scale, spend per developer across tracked models runs from claude-haiku-4-5 at $51 to gpt-5.6-sol at $9,818 — a spread list pricing alone never reveals, because it depends entirely on what people reach for the model to do.

Against other models

ModelPer developerShare
claude-fable-5$5,10514%
gpt-5.6-sol$9,81819%
claude-opus-5$9,21518%
claude-opus-4-8$4,91014%
gpt-5.5$4,92112%
claude-opus-4-7$1,8534%
claude-opus-4-6$1,3043%
claude-sonnet-5$8252%
gpt-5.4$7311%

How this is measured

Developers run npx viberank-cli, which reads token counts and API-equivalent costs that ccusage computes from their own local session logs. Spend here is what the usage would cost at model list prices — most people on the board pay a flat subscription instead, so this measures consumption rather than a bill.

Full methodology, caveats and a free JSON endpoint are on the data page. For the distribution across developers rather than models, see what Claude Code actually costs.