viberank
Model economics

Observed spend

gpt-5.5

What developers actually spend on gpt-5.5 — measured from real sessions, not list prices. For specs and pricing tables, look elsewhere; this page only answers what the model costs the people using it.

Per developer
$5,202
across their tracked usage
Developers
280
observed using it
Share of spend
13%
#5 of all models tracked

Mixed use

Spend per developer sits mid-pack: used for real work without being the default for the heaviest sessions.

For scale, spend per developer across tracked models runs from claude-haiku-4-5 at $52 to gpt-5.6-sol at $12,519 — a spread list pricing alone never reveals, because it depends entirely on what people reach for the model to do.

Against other models

ModelPer developerShare
gpt-5.5$5,20213%
gpt-5.6-sol$12,51922%
claude-opus-4-8$5,11617%
claude-fable-5$5,49417%
claude-opus-5$8,13215%
claude-opus-4-6$1,7976%
claude-opus-4-7$1,7574%
claude-sonnet-5$6362%
gpt-5.4$7651%

How this is measured

Developers run npx viberank-cli, which reads token counts and API-equivalent costs that ccusage computes from their own local session logs. Spend here is what the usage would cost at model list prices — most people on the board pay a flat subscription instead, so this measures consumption rather than a bill.

Folded from 2 raw identifiers: [pi] gpt-5.5, gpt-5.5 — the same model reached through different harnesses.

Full methodology, caveats and a free JSON endpoint are on the data page. For the distribution across developers rather than models, see what Claude Code actually costs.