viberank
Model economics

Observed spend

gpt-6-astra

What developers actually spend on gpt-6-astra — measured from real sessions, not list prices. For specs and pricing tables, look elsewhere; this page only answers what the model costs the people using it.

Per developer
$4,560
across their tracked usage
Developers
167
observed using it
Share of spend
4%
#7 of all models tracked

Mixed use

Spend per developer sits mid-pack: used for real work without being the default for the heaviest sessions.

For scale, spend per developer across tracked models runs from claude-haiku-4-5 at $52 to claude-opus-5 at $13,154 — a spread list pricing alone never reveals, because it depends entirely on what people reach for the model to do.

Against other models

ModelPer developerShare
gpt-6-astra$4,5604%
claude-opus-5$13,15423%
gpt-5.6-sol$9,33516%
claude-opus-4-8$4,78312%
claude-fable-5$5,03612%
gpt-5.5$4,72110%
claude-opus-4-7$2,0483%
claude-opus-4-6$1,6573%
claude-sonnet-5$9842%

How this is measured

Developers run npx viberank-cli, which reads token counts and API-equivalent costs that ccusage computes from their own local session logs. Spend here is what the usage would cost at model list prices — most people on the board pay a flat subscription instead, so this measures consumption rather than a bill.

Full methodology, caveats and a free JSON endpoint are on the data page. For the distribution across developers rather than models, see what Claude Code actually costs.